LADY IN THE WATER
by Kevin Koehler
There's really no twist to speak of in M. Night Shyamalan's latest, Lady
in the Water, unless you consider the lack of a twist a twist.
Perhaps the picture as a whole is the twist, in the way that we
have come to expect generally entertaining, if flawed, films from
Night; Lady defies expectation by being a borderline unwatchable,
poorly-constructed mess. Or maybe the film simply is, on the face,
what it is: a director's love letter to himself, the martyred,
fashionably-dressed messiah whose work may someday save the world
if only we'd let it.
And by "we," I don't mean audiences. I mean film critics,
specifically those who did not like Night's previous picture, The
Village. If you are a film critic and you liked The Village,
then you are doing just fine and please disregard this message (but
maybe have a word with your friends, will you?). The whole saving
of mankind business may proceed.
Full disclosure: though I can't say I loved The Village or
would even recommend it, I didn't hate it as others did. Which circle
of Hell my relative ambivalence to this film places me in I do not
know.
The titular lady of Lady in the Water is not really a lady
but a "narf" (played by Bryce Dallas Howard, who could
use some sun), a narf being a sea nymph of Asian legend who appears
one day in the swimming pool of a Philadelphia apartment complex. "In
the Water" is also somewhat of a misnomer as Story (as the narf
is named) spends most of the film not in water but in the shower
stall of a stu-stu-stuttering property manager with a tragic backstory
(natch), Cleveland Heep (Paul Giamati). With the assistance of other
habitants (good actors wasted) of the complex, Cleveland must help
Story find a writer she came there to inspire (Story...writer...get
it?), a writer who will author the greatest novel in the history
of time itself, changing the world as we know it. This novel will
be so revolutionary, so dangerous that the writer will be assassinated
after its publication, never to see the Eden-like paradise that he
created. But he will write it anyway, regardless of personal consequence,
because this is what people who save the world do.
The part of this writer is played by a handsomely-dressed M. Night
Shyamalan.
There's also some stuff with dogs with grass growing on them, monkeys,
a guy who only works out one side of his body, giant eagles, and
some offensive stereotyping of Asian people. It's all about as ridiculous
as it sounds. Some petty score settling is attempted in the form
of a pretentious film critic (Bob Balaban), killed for deigning to
know the complex mind of this film's creator (a capital offense,
apparently). He dares to predict Lady's plot; yet there
is no logic to it and thus cannot be reasoned. You see, Night constructed Lady as
a bedtime tale he told his children, with apparent little regard
for characterization, internal narrative coherence, or any other
aspect of what is generally known in the free world as successful
storytelling.
M. Night Shyamalan has always been a better director than a writer.
His films are littered with obvious, gaping holes in logic - they
often suffer because of them on second and third viewings (How does
Bruce Willis not try to talk to anyone besides his wife and the kid
who sees dead people? Aliens who are killed by something as simple
as water come to a planet 70% covered by it?). However, his ability
to compose shots in a manner building tension and suspense has never
been called into question, at least not by me. Until now.
In a lot of ways, Lady in the Water could have been made
by anyone, if that anyone had the monstrous ego of M. Night Shyamalan
to cast a cipher such as himself in the important role of Jesus with
a typewriter. Beyond the uninvolving, aggressively preposterous plot
(whose glaring inconsistencies are too many to discuss individually),
there is a simple disregard for such directing basics as where to
place the camera, how to fill the frame, and when to yell "cut." Perhaps
the story was too personal for any real objectivity, though it must
be said he makes it bizarrely, inappropriately personal. Enamored
with the mirror, Lady is Night cutting off
his ear only to give it to himself. It might be a constructive exercise
for him to try adapting someone else's material for a change - it's
about time he found a new muse.
Interesting footnote: In 2004, the Sci Fi Channel aired a "documentary" entitled The
Buried Secret of M. Night Shyamalan. During the program, Night
claimed to have fallen into a frozen pond as a child and been legally
dead for a half hour - since this time he has been able to speak
with ghosts. It was later revealed as a hoax (with Night's full
cooperation), part of the publicity campaign for The Village.
Various media outlets were notably upset, having impugned their
own credibility after reporting on Night's talking to the dead
business (the network had distributed press releases advertising
Night's boyhood revelation). Controversy ensued with blame, according
Night, resting ultimately with the Sci Fi Channel. "I was,
of course, involved in the production of the special but had nothing
to do with the marketing of it,” he said. “If the
Sci Fi Channel erred in their marketing strategy, it was totally
out of enthusiasm."
© Pretentious Musings. This review may not be reprinted, in
whole or in part, without the express consent of its author. |